Re: Is This a Feature?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: Is This a Feature?"
• Previous message: Katherine Macfarlane: "Is This a Feature?"
• Maybe in reply to: Katherine Macfarlane: "Is This a Feature?"
• Next in thread: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: Is This a Feature?"

At 3:01 PM 3/3/97, Katherine Macfarlane wrote:
>I've been using splitlog and wwwstat for several months to collect data about
>hits to our corporate Web site, and overall, I like them very much.
>However,...
>
>When I enter, for example, ''splitlog -d "Feb" +', I get data for every day in
>every February going back to the flood (well, almost), and when I enter
>'splitlog -d "1997" +' I get all the data for 1997.
>
>But, if I enter 'splitlog -d "February 1997" +', I get zip--no logfiles, and
>empty dnscache files.
>
>To get data for February, 1997, I have to enter 'splitlog -d "Feb (lots
>and lots
>of regular expressions) 1997" +'.  This works, for which I am thankful, but it
>sure would be a lot easier to tell splitlog to go get the stuff for "Feb 1997".
>
>Any idea why it's set up this way?
>
>--Kat Macfarlane
>  katm@metaware.com

I believe this was missent to me.

Tad DeWree
Thinkinginc

• Next message: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: Is This a Feature?"
• Previous message: Katherine Macfarlane: "Is This a Feature?"
• Maybe in reply to: Katherine Macfarlane: "Is This a Feature?"
• Next in thread: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: Is This a Feature?"