Re: %header_order membership
Cliff Wheatley (cwheat@concordia.net)
Thu, 14 Aug 1997 02:07:53 -0500
At 14:35:51 Wed, 13 Aug 1997 +0200 (MET DST), ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote:
>
> [code removed]
>
At 04:10 PM 8/13/97 +0200, Gisle Aas <aas@bergen.sn.no> wrote:
> [previous post removed]
>
>It is there too:
>
> X-Meta-Foo
> All <meta> elements will initialize headers with the
> prefix "X-Meta-". If the element contains a http-equiv
> attribute, then it will be honored as the header name.
>
>i.e. you get a header called 'X-Meta-Keywords' with a value of "blah,
>blah".
>
>--
>Gisle Aas <aas@sn.no>
>
>
And that's what's causing my concern, is the x-meta-foo header _completely_
equivalent to the meta tag? Will a prior-to-HTTP/1.1 browser (or search
engine) respond to the x-meta-foo header? I suspect not. Any thoughts?
-Cliff ^ --_ |
When the chips are down, ( ( _ T | Don't get buffaloed.
the buffalo is empty. "" v ! ! """""" | Instead, visit =>
' ' | http://www.concordia.net/DIY/