Re: %header_order membership
Cliff Wheatley (cwheat@concordia.net)
Tue, 12 Aug 1997 21:21:12 -0500
At 02:13 PM 8/12/97 +0200, Gisle Aas <aas@bergen.sn.no> wrote:
> [previous message removed]
>
>The %header_order hash is not fixed either. As you use HTTP::Headers
>objects with non-standard header names we will add them to
>%header_order (look at _header_cmp).
My question was prompted by general laziness. I guess I could just paste
the list into my package, but that defeats the purpose of OO, doesn't it?
>I suggest that you just make your own hash with the header names you
>want to be legal, or you might try to propose some interface that we
>should add to HTTP::Headers.
Hhmmm. . . After reviewing the HTTP & HTML specs, I'm a little confused.
I was trying to parse META info into an HTML::TreeBuilder object. But it
appears that %header_order is response header specific, HTTP-EQUIV type
stuff right? Is it appropriate to use HTTP::Headers for META tag stuff? If
not, did I miss a module that handles <HEAD> elements?
-Cliff ^ --_ |
When the chips are down, ( ( _ T | Don't get buffaloed.
the buffalo is empty. "" v ! ! """""" | Instead, visit =>
' ' | http://www.concordia.net/DIY/