Re: Any plans for SSLeay support?
Doug MacEachern (dougm@osf.org)
Mon, 09 Dec 1996 10:14:58 -0500
Gisle Aas <aas@bergen.sn.no> wrote:
> Doug MacEachern <dougm@osf.org> writes:
> > I had a need for this at one point, sat down and wrote
> > LWP::SSLeayIO, LWP::SSLeaySocket, LWP::Protocol::https
> > and some other gunk. I had trouble trying to leave
> > existing classes alone, this required duplicating much
> > code. I got as far as the server logging an error
> > about invalid SSL something or other.
> > But, due to time constraints, got around my problem
> > another way. My biggest mistake was writing this in
> > the source tree, later forgetting, deleting, argh.
>
> Shit happens :-(
How true, but I only lost a little code, and how to write it
again is still upstairs :-)
>
> What was your major aproach for this? Did you use the SSLeay.pm
> module? (http://www.neuronio.pt/SSLeay.pm)
Yes, SSLeay.pm with libssl underneath, do all of the real work.
>
> Would it be possible to just do a LWP::SSLeay_IO and then let the
> normal LWP::Protocol::http module talk over a channel like that?
This is possible, and probably the right way to go, but http.pm and
LWP::Socket would still require some changes. My plan was just to
get something working without changing existing modules, then let
you decide. I will need this in the coming weeks, I could try to do
it sooner than later, unless someone else does. So, if anyone has
their own plans for adding this support please let the list know.
Cheers,
-Doug
>
> Regards,
> Gisle
>