Re: Four patches for LWP (and comments)
Marc Hedlund (hedlund@best.com)
Tue, 8 Aug 1995 15:00:13 -0700
At 12:02 AM 8/8/95, Gisle Aas wrote:
>There seem to be general agreement about this issue, so lets do it. I guess
>we should then get rid of HTTP::Message's dependency on LWP::MemberMixin?
Yes, I think that would be good.
>How about this:
>
> HTTP::
> ::Message
> ::Request
> ::Response
> ::Headers
> ::Status (or ::StatusCode)
> ::Date
I like this very much, as it bundles everything I wanted for CGI::Response
into one distribution, and includes nothing extraneous -- i.e., reusability
has been achieved. :)
::Status v. ::StatusCode certainly isn't a big issue -- I suggested
::Status because it handles more than just codes (particularly with the
mnemonic functions). Plus it's shorter. But like I say, no big issue.
::Date seems to be a good idea in HTTP:: based on Tim's recent comments --
a light weight module that does everything according to the HTTP spec and
does little or nothing else.
>If everyone can agree on this I'll make the change for the next release.
Marc Hedlund <hedlund@best.com>