FTP Archives
Tim Bunce (Tim.Bunce@ig.co.uk)
Wed, 22 Mar 1995 21:12:33 +0000
Wow, we got quite a few offers!
Martijn: Offered but possible reachability/performace problems.
Joel: Offered but notes that it may be better to centralise.
Roy: Use existing UCI archive (fast machine and connection)
but notes that updates may be slow.
Plus assorted other offers and ideas (thanks to everyone).
Some thoughts:
A. Most modules are going to be relatively small.
B. Posting to the mailing lists should be the primary
distribution mechanism within the mailing lists.
C. Given A and B above the archive will be mainly for
distributing to end users.
Roy, are you happy to a) give reasonable priority to updating contrib
from either mailing list postings or ftp.ics.uci.edu:/incoming, and
b) provide space for CGI modules as well as libwww-perl modules ?
If so then I'd suggest we take up Roy's offer and other ftp sites
should mirror the contents of the UCI libwww-perl tree.
If not then perhaps Joel's machine would be the next best alternative.
Is that agreeable?
Regards,
Tim.