HTTP-WG Mailing List Archive for 2000 by author

• About this archive
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]
• Other mail archives

Starting: Tue 06 Jan 1970 - 06:42:24 PST
Ending: Tue 08 Dec 1970 - 06:53:52 PST
Messages: 325

• =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= LEDAIN
  • "Via" header field Mon, 2 Oct 2000 10:52:44 +0200 (MEST)
• =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?vK3BpLG5?=
  • test mail dont read this Wed, 19 Jan 2000 17:50:35 +0900
• Adworks Solo Advertising
  • Adworks 2 for 1 special promotion! 25 Jul 2000 07:39:24 -0000
  • Adworks Buy One Solo, Get one Free! 23 Jul 2000 22:01:31 -0000
  • Adworks Buy One Solo, Get one Free! 23 Jul 2000 22:01:29 -0000
  • 100% SPAM FREE email marketing works! 23 Jul 2000 05:37:37 -0000
  • How to turn your mailbox into a Money-Magnet 23 Jul 2000 05:57:23 -0000
  • I've Developed The Perfect Hi-Tech, Hi-Touch, Home Business 23 Jul 2000 05:30:34 -0000
  • FINANCIALLY FREE in LESS THAN 30 Minutes a Day 22 Jul 2000 22:31:55 -0000
  • I've Developed The Perfect Hi-Tech, Hi-Touch, Home Business 23 Jul 2000 05:30:35 -0000
  • Unlimited Free Long Distance! 22 Jul 2000 15:26:28 -0000
  • Unlimited Free Long Distance! 22 Jul 2000 15:26:27 -0000
  • Downline U.S.A.! 22 Jul 2000 15:16:34 -0000
  • Downline U.S.A.! 22 Jul 2000 15:16:33 -0000
• Alexander op de Weegh
  • Spaces allowed between chunk size and semi-colon? Thu, 10 Aug 2000 14:32:22 +0100
• Andy Norman
  • Re: FW: WG Action: HyperText Transfer Protocol (http) to conclude 23 Oct 2000 15:38:23 +0100
  • Adminstrivia: spam fix Wed, 09 Aug 2000 16:22:44 +0100
• Anupama Devi
  • HTTP_REFERER Thu, 18 May 2000 20:40:40 GMT
• Ari Gordon-Schlosberg
  • Re: Has Netscape 5 become 6? Mon, 8 May 2000 16:39:52 -0500
• Balachander Krishnamurthy
  • Re: Conformance Test for HTTP 1.1 Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:18:44 -0400
  • Last Call on delta encoding in HTTP/1.1 Fri, 17 Mar 2000 19:25:10 -0500
  • Re: protocol verification Wed, 02 Feb 2000 09:58:49 -0500
• Bjoern Hoehrmann
  • Re: HTTP/1.1: RFC2068 versus RFC2616, RFC1590 versus RFC2048 Sun, 10 Sep 2000 15:45:39 +0200
  • Re: Combining multiple message-header fields Sat, 15 Jul 2000 21:55:51 +0200
  • Combining multiple message-header fields Sat, 15 Jul 2000 17:44:40 +0200
• Brad Taylor
  • apache source included....Re: CRLF on POST requests, where/how Tue, 20 Jun 2000 14:08:30 -0500
  • CRLF on POST requests, where/how specified (repost from prior bad Tue, 20 Jun 2000 11:57:35 -0500
  • Re: subscribe Tue, 20 Jun 2000 11:55:00 -0500
• Carl Kugler
  • Re: Push technology Thu, 7 Dec 2000 14:38:33 -0700
• Carl Kugler/Boulder/IBM
  • Re: Fw: Last Call: On the use of HTTP as a Substrate for Other Protocols to Tue, 7 Nov 2000 15:09:03 -0700
  • RE: Of HTTP-over-SSL/TLS connection persistence Mon, 6 Nov 2000 09:44:45 -0700
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 2 Nov 2000 13:19:01 -0700
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 2 Nov 2000 12:46:21 -0700
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timer Thu, 2 Nov 2000 12:11:18 -0700
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 2 Nov 2000 12:07:15 -0700
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 2 Nov 2000 10:59:16 -0700
  • Re: Conformance Test for HTTP 1.1 Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:31:51 -0600
  • Re: Conformance Test for HTTP 1.1 Tue, 10 Oct 2000 08:57:38 -0600
  • Re: Conformance Test for HTTP 1.1 Mon, 9 Oct 2000 13:39:51 -0600
  • RE: Conformance Test for HTTP 1.1 Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:42:26 -0600
  • RE: Conformance Test for HTTP 1.1 Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:17:12 -0600
• Caveman
  • Re: Conformance Test for HTTP 1.1 Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:23:10 -0500
  • Re: Conformance Test for HTTP 1.1 Sat, 7 Oct 2000 15:54:58 -0500
• Christopher K. St. John
  • Re: On pipelining -Reply Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:22:03 -0600
  • Re: On pipelining -Reply Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:28:33 -0600
• Daniel Hellerstein
  • Re: On pipelining -Reply -Reply Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:48:11 -0500
  • RE: On pipelining -Reply Fri, 21 Jan 2000 12:19:33 -0500
  • On pipelining Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:35:53 -0500
• Dave Kristol
  • Re: Set-Cookie Header Fri, 8 Dec 2000 09:05:24 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Caching Problem with 1.0 and a Proxy Server Wed, 8 Nov 2000 09:20:05 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 2 Nov 2000 12:17:28 -0500 (EST)
  • [Fwd: RFC 2965 on HTTP State Management Mechanism] Sat, 07 Oct 2000 15:13:21 -0400
  • Re: HTTP image transfer Thu, 28 Sep 2000 09:19:35 -0400 (EDT)
  • nit on IETF HTTP-WG charter page Fri, 25 Aug 2000 17:37:31 -0400
  • [Fwd: Protocol Action: Use of HTTP State Management to BCP] Tue, 08 Aug 2000 11:13:57 -0400
  • Re: CRLF on POST requests, where/how specified (repost from prior bad subject line) Tue, 20 Jun 2000 14:11:52 -0400 (EDT)
  • [Fwd: Last Call: Use of HTTP State Management to BCP] Fri, 28 Apr 2000 12:50:20 -0400
  • RE: webmail vulnerabilities: a new pragma token? Thu, 20 Jan 2000 14:43:17 -0500 (EST)
• David W. Morris
  • RE: ticket based authentication Wed, 2 Aug 2000 19:02:07 -0400 (EDT)
  • Re: If-Modified-Since implementation question Wed, 2 Feb 2000 20:34:07 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: On pipelining -Reply -Reply Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:58:45 -0800 (PST)
  • RE: webmail vulnerabilities: a new pragma token? Thu, 20 Jan 2000 10:48:04 -0800 (PST)
• DCNYMel@aol.com
  • UNSUBSCRIBE Tue, 25 Jul 2000 09:47:34 EDT
• Denis A. Doroshenko
  • user agent header question Tue, 14 Mar 2000 09:11:51 +0200
• dillon@hns.com
  • Re: Http overhead Thu, 30 Nov 2000 08:47:08 -0500
  • Re: Http overhead Thu, 30 Nov 2000 08:47:08 -0500
  • Reference HTTP 1.1 Client And Server Implementations Mon, 6 Nov 2000 10:42:23 -0500
  • More On Persistent Connections... Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:47:31 -0500
• Duane Wessels
  • Questions (errata?) about caching authenticated responses Wed, 19 Jul 2000 23:47:59 -0600
• Eric D. Williams
  • RE: webmail vulnerabilities: a new pragma token? Thu, 20 Jan 2000 20:45:25 -0500
  • RE: webmail vulnerabilities: a new pragma token? Thu, 20 Jan 2000 15:15:56 -0500
  • RE: webmail vulnerabilities: a new pragma token? Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:28:11 -0500
  • RE: webmail vulnerabilities: a new pragma token? Wed, 19 Jan 2000 22:32:19 -0500
  • RE: webmail vulnerabilities: a new pragma token? Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:12:12 -0500
• Fielding, Roy
  • RE: Thanks Re Caching Problem Wed, 8 Nov 2000 14:50:17 -0800
  • RE: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 2 Nov 2000 10:08:27 -0800
• Frank Siebenlist
  • local http-proxy with http in and https out Fri, 26 May 2000 02:31:32 +0000
• Fred Bohle
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 2 Nov 2000 12:27:24 -0600
  • Re: problem with responses to post-requests Fri, 25 Aug 2000 08:26:43 -0500
  • RE: CRLF on POST requests, where/how specified (repost from prior Tue, 20 Jun 2000 12:51:11 -0500
  • Re: Two questions Mon, 24 Jan 2000 09:18:23 -0600
  • Re: On pipelining Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:48:42 -0600
• Henry Johnston
  • HTTP Sun, 27 Feb 2000 19:17:49 +0700
• http://www.roseindia.net
  • HTTPs Sun, 14 Nov 1999 23:12:56 +0530
• Hyoung-Kee Choi
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timer Thu, 02 Nov 2000 13:38:47 -0500
• Ilker Gokhan
  • Re: Push technology Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:27:20 +0200
• James G Smith
  • Re: ticket based authentication Thu, 10 Aug 2000 10:14:19 -0500
  • ticket based authentication Wed, 09 Aug 2000 16:47:09 -0500
  • Re: ticket based authentication Wed, 02 Aug 2000 14:43:31 -0500
  • ticket based authentication Wed, 02 Aug 2000 09:34:07 -0500
• James Lacey
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 02 Nov 2000 13:51:38 -0600
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 02 Nov 2000 13:22:08 -0600
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 02 Nov 2000 13:13:13 -0600
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 02 Nov 2000 11:59:01 -0600
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 02 Nov 2000 11:11:16 -0600
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 02 Nov 2000 09:26:01 -0600
  • Using Chunked encoding to send control messages to a client Fri, 5 May 2000 07:46:33 -0500 (CST)
• Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com
  • Of HTTP-over-SSL/TLS connection persistence Fri, 03 Nov 2000 14:39:23 -0800
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 02 Nov 2000 09:45:39 -0800
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 02 Nov 2000 08:46:04 -0800
  • Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Wed, 01 Nov 2000 23:43:48 -0800
  • whither HTTP? Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:10:29 -0700
• Jeffrey Mogul
  • Another erratum for RFC2616 Mon, 04 Dec 2000 16:15:47 -0800
  • Re: Caching Problem with 1.0 and a Proxy Server Tue, 07 Nov 2000 17:40:12 -0800
  • Re: "Via" header field Mon, 02 Oct 2000 10:41:25 -0700
  • Last Call for comments on "Delta encoding in HTTP" Tue, 19 Sep 2000 11:41:23 -0700
  • Re: Legal tokens Tue, 12 Sep 2000 11:32:35 -0700
  • Re: Proxy-connection Tue, 12 Sep 2000 11:25:21 -0700
  • Re: Proxy-connection Mon, 11 Sep 2000 18:23:46 -0700
  • Re: Cache-Control Mon, 14 Aug 2000 11:24:18 -0700
  • Another revision of the I-D on "Delta encoding in HTTP" Wed, 31 May 2000 17:10:42 -0700
  • Re: persistent conncetion HOL blocking Thu, 11 May 2000 10:21:49 -0700
  • Re: Question for HTTP/1.1 cache implementors (both proxy & client caches) Wed, 19 Apr 2000 16:40:35 -0700
  • Question for HTTP/1.1 cache implementors (both proxy & client caches) Wed, 19 Apr 2000 11:28:25 -0700
  • Re: Proxies and incorrect Content-Length Thu, 23 Mar 2000 15:48:24 -0800
  • Two newish technical reports based on an HTTP trace Wed, 08 Mar 2000 15:08:03 -0800
• Jim Gettys
  • Re: HTTP/1.1: RFC2068 versus RFC2616, RFC1590 versus RFC2048 Sun, 10 Sep 2000 07:58:37 -0700 (PDT)
• Jim Whitehead
  • Improving HTTP/DAV status reporting Tue, 15 Aug 2000 17:51:46 -0700
• Jim Witt
  • Legal tokens Tue, 05 Sep 2000 14:20:04 -0400
• Joakim G.
  • protocol verification Wed, 02 Feb 2000 14:13:51 +0100
• joannam
  • E-mail name change for this user. Wed, 5 Apr 2000 04:24:39 -0500
• Joe Orton
  • TLS upgrade implementations? Tue, 4 Jul 2000 14:37:38 +0100
  • Re: Proxies, Request-URI, and digest-uri Wed, 15 Mar 2000 10:57:43 +0000
  • Proxies, Request-URI, and digest-uri Tue, 14 Mar 2000 01:53:05 +0000
• John C. Mallery
  • Re: Proxy-connection Wed, 6 Sep 2000 11:24:43 -0400
  • Proxy-connection Fri, 1 Sep 2000 22:19:32 -0400
  • Use Proxy 305 (corrected) Fri, 25 Aug 2000 15:22:10 -0400
  • Use Proxy 505 Fri, 25 Aug 2000 15:05:08 -0400
  • RE: Microsoft HTTP 1.1 Conformance? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:38:52 -0500
  • Microsoft HTTP 1.1 Conformance? Tue, 11 Apr 2000 21:55:22 -0500
• John Stracke
  • Re: Http overhead Fri, 01 Dec 2000 10:04:16 -0500
  • Re: Http overhead Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:45:08 -0500
  • Re: Reference HTTP 1.1 Client And Server Implementations Mon, 06 Nov 2000 11:27:05 -0500
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 02 Nov 2000 11:00:47 -0500
  • Re: Conformance Test for HTTP 1.1 Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:35:32 -0400
  • Re: Content-Encoding: gzip AND Content-Type:application/x-javascript Thu, 07 Sep 2000 10:02:10 -0400
  • Re: problem with responses to post-requests Fri, 25 Aug 2000 12:09:53 -0400
  • Re: Cache-Control Fri, 18 Aug 2000 12:00:47 -0400
  • Re: draft-ietf-tls-http-upgrade reissued Mon, 08 May 2000 10:00:04 -0400
  • Re: draft-ietf-tls-http-upgrade reissued Fri, 05 May 2000 11:23:00 -0400
  • Re: draft-ietf-tls-http-upgrade reissued Thu, 04 May 2000 17:39:49 -0400
  • Re: HTTP Age Header Field (Section 14.6) - should overflow value be 2^31 Mon, 13 Mar 2000 10:44:21 -0500
• Jordi Ros
  • HTTP traffic statistics Wed, 8 Mar 2000 17:17:17 -0800
  • Testing web server speed Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:03:54 -0800
  • Re: HTTP entity length Wed, 02 Feb 2000 10:12:44 -0800
  • HTTP entity length Tue, 01 Feb 2000 10:34:12 -0800
• Joris Dobbelsteen
  • RE: Http overhead Sat, 2 Dec 2000 17:33:10 +0100
  • RE: Http overhead Fri, 1 Dec 2000 22:24:25 +0100
  • RE: Http overhead Fri, 1 Dec 2000 15:28:21 +0100
  • RE: Http overhead Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:16:20 +0100
  • RE: IPv6 and HTTP (1.2?) Wed, 29 Nov 2000 13:46:10 +0100
  • RE: IPv6 and HTTP (1.2?) Tue, 28 Nov 2000 17:37:48 +0100
  • RE: Thanks Re Caching Problem Thu, 9 Nov 2000 20:56:16 +0100
  • RE: Of HTTP-over-SSL/TLS connection persistence Tue, 7 Nov 2000 18:43:34 +0100
  • RE: Of HTTP-over-SSL/TLS connection persistence Sun, 5 Nov 2000 18:21:53 +0100
  • RE: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Sun, 5 Nov 2000 18:01:08 +0100
  • RE: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Sun, 5 Nov 2000 17:46:10 +0100
  • RE: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Sun, 5 Nov 2000 17:57:25 +0100
  • RE: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 2 Nov 2000 16:24:23 +0100
  • RE: caching problems Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:59:26 +0200
  • Host header and URL Thu, 26 Oct 2000 13:50:21 +0200
  • RE: monitored???? Thu, 5 Oct 2000 20:56:47 +0200
  • RE: Legal tokens Tue, 12 Sep 2000 16:37:02 +0200
  • RE: Proxy-connection Tue, 12 Sep 2000 16:34:05 +0200
  • RE: Legal tokens Wed, 6 Sep 2000 19:32:29 +0200
  • RE: Legal tokens Wed, 6 Sep 2000 19:28:51 +0200
  • RE: Proxy-connection Sat, 2 Sep 2000 14:59:34 +0200
  • RE: problem with responses to post-requests Sun, 27 Aug 2000 13:17:26 +0200
  • RE: Use Proxy 305 (corrected) Sun, 27 Aug 2000 13:25:26 +0200
  • RE: Microsoft HTTP 1.1 Conformance? Sat, 19 Aug 2000 22:28:10 +0200
  • RE: Cache-Control Tue, 15 Aug 2000 15:33:15 +0200
  • Cache-Control Mon, 14 Aug 2000 18:32:22 +0200
  • RE: ticket based authentication Wed, 2 Aug 2000 21:26:08 +0200
  • RE: Questions (errata?) about caching authenticated responses Thu, 27 Jul 2000 20:51:03 +0200
  • RE: Questions (errata?) about caching authenticated responses Mon, 24 Jul 2000 19:30:09 +0200
  • RE: Questions (errata?) about caching authenticated responses Sat, 22 Jul 2000 16:05:31 +0200
  • RE: Question of many METHODs Wed, 5 Apr 2000 14:56:40 +0200
• Joseph Link
  • Content-Encoding: gzip AND Content-Type: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 23:39:54 -0500
• Josh Cohen
  • RE: Microsoft HTTP 1.1 Conformance? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:49:37 -0700
  • RE: webmail vulnerabilities: a new pragma token? Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:54:29 -0800
  • RE: webmail vulnerabilities: a new pragma token? Wed, 19 Jan 2000 23:32:27 -0800
• Julien Pierre
  • Re: Of HTTP-over-SSL/TLS connection persistence Fri, 03 Nov 2000 16:00:26 -0800
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Fri, 03 Nov 2000 15:05:58 -0800
  • Re: Legal tokens Wed, 06 Sep 2000 13:14:13 -0700
  • Re: draft-ietf-tls-http-upgrade reissued Fri, 05 May 2000 19:27:42 -0700
  • Re: draft-ietf-tls-http-upgrade reissued Fri, 05 May 2000 17:22:36 -0700
  • Re: draft-ietf-tls-http-upgrade reissued Thu, 04 May 2000 18:35:14 -0700
  • Re: draft-ietf-tls-http-upgrade reissued Thu, 04 May 2000 15:32:22 -0700
  • Re: draft-ietf-tls-http-upgrade reissued Thu, 04 May 2000 14:28:47 -0700
  • Re: draft-ietf-tls-http-upgrade reissued Thu, 04 May 2000 14:03:55 -0700
  • Re: draft-ietf-tls-http-upgrade reissued Wed, 03 May 2000 22:42:42 -0700
  • Re: If-Modified-Since implementation question Thu, 03 Feb 2000 13:10:17 -0800
  • If-Modified-Since implementation question Wed, 02 Feb 2000 17:16:51 -0800
  • Re: On pipelining -Reply -Reply Mon, 24 Jan 2000 18:48:50 -0800
• Kaming Young
  • Re: persistent conncetion HOL blocking Fri, 12 May 2000 00:07:50 +0800
  • persistent conncetion HOL blocking Thu, 11 May 2000 10:03:23 +0800
  • Has Netscape 5 become 6? Sun, 07 May 2000 23:10:14 +0800
• Keith Hoffman
  • Re: Conformance Test for HTTP 1.1 Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:04:09 -0500
  • Re: problem with responses to post-requests Fri, 25 Aug 2000 21:01:52 GMT
  • Re: Microsoft HTTP 1.1 Conformance? Tue, 22 Aug 2000 08:31:29 -0500
  • Re: Has Netscape 5 become 6? Wed, 10 May 2000 18:27:53 -0500
  • Question on proxy/client behaviour Mon, 24 Apr 2000 12:59:39 -0500
  • Re: Microsoft HTTP 1.1 Conformance? Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:55:31 -0500
• Keith Moore
  • IETF Adelaide and interim meetings for APPS WGs Mon, 14 Feb 2000 18:37:05 -0500
• Koen Holtman
  • Re: Legal tokens Tue, 12 Sep 2000 07:10:30 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: Legal tokens Wed, 6 Sep 2000 07:25:02 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: Use Proxy 305 (corrected) Thu, 31 Aug 2000 07:51:21 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: [Fwd: Last Call: Use of HTTP State Management to BCP] Sun, 30 Apr 2000 21:44:54 +0200 (MET DST)
  • Re: Two questions Wed, 26 Jan 2000 12:24:36 +0100 (MET)
• Kojiro Goto
  • Question of many METHODs Wed, 05 Apr 2000 18:24:04 +0900
• Kristan Vingrys
  • Conformance Test for HTTP 1.1 Thu, 05 Oct 2000 11:08:13 +1100
• kugler@us.ibm.com
  • Re: Using Chunked encoding to send control messages to a client Fri, 5 May 2000 09:34:42 -0600
• Larry Masinter
  • RE: IPv6 and HTTP (1.2?) Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:15:15 -0800
  • Fw: Last Call: On the use of HTTP as a Substrate for Other Protocols to BCP Tue, 7 Nov 2000 07:02:08 -0800
  • FW: BCP 44, RFC 2964 on Use of HTTP State Management Fri, 13 Oct 2000 07:36:35 -0700
  • FW: WG Action: HyperText Transfer Protocol (http) to conclude Thu, 12 Oct 2000 12:19:52 -0700
  • request to close HTTP-WG Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:41:07 -0700
  • Re: The future of HTTP Tue, 5 Sep 2000 13:15:39 -0700
  • RE: On pipelining -Reply -Reply Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:11:51 -0800
  • RE: On pipelining Fri, 21 Jan 2000 08:09:38 -0800
  • RE: webmail vulnerabilities: a new pragma token? Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:16:23 -0800
• Larry Rufo
  • RE: user agent header question Tue, 14 Mar 2000 14:37:38 -0500
• Life is hard, and then you die
  • Re: Proxy-connection Sat, 2 Sep 2000 14:22:59 -0700
  • Re: ticket based authentication Wed, 2 Aug 2000 08:46:05 -0700
  • Re: Combining multiple message-header fields Sat, 15 Jul 2000 12:39:55 -0700
  • Re: CRLF on POST requests, where/how specified (repost from prior bad subject line) Tue, 20 Jun 2000 11:21:07 -0700
• M. Drew Streib
  • Re: Testing web server speed Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:07:10 -0800 (PST)
• Marc Slemko
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 2 Nov 2000 10:18:47 -0800 (PST)
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 2 Nov 2000 09:20:56 -0800 (PST)
• Marek Wyrwicki
  • WAP gateway and HTTP Fri, 12 May 2000 08:12:15 +0200
• Mark Nottingham
  • Re: Http overhead Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:11:39 -0800
  • ANN: HTTP compliance mailing list Fri, 13 Oct 2000 16:24:45 -0700
  • Re: Conformance Test for HTTP 1.1 Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:25:19 -0700
  • Re: Conformance Test for HTTP 1.1 Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:55:07 -0700
  • Re: Conformance Test for HTTP 1.1 Sat, 7 Oct 2000 14:13:54 -0700
  • Re: Conformance Test for HTTP 1.1 Fri, 6 Oct 2000 09:30:53 -0700
  • Re: Conformance Test for HTTP 1.1 Thu, 5 Oct 2000 11:08:20 -0700
  • Re: Content-Encoding: gzip AND Content-Type: application/x-javascript Wed, 6 Sep 2000 22:11:12 -0700
  • Re: Questions (errata?) about caching authenticated responses Mon, 24 Jul 2000 11:24:46 -0700
  • Re: Questions (errata?) about caching authenticated responses Sat, 22 Jul 2000 12:28:13 -0700
  • Re: HTTP Age Header Field (Section 14.6) - should overflow value be 2^31 or (2^31)-1? Mon, 13 Mar 2000 13:14:54 -0800
  • Requirements Summary Thu, 24 Feb 2000 18:22:02 -0800
  • Re: webmail vulnerabilities: a new pragma token? Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:46:13 +1100
• Matthew Delco
  • Re: persistent conncetion HOL blocking Fri, 12 May 2000 11:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
  • Re: HTTP Age Header Field (Section 14.6) - should overflow value be Mon, 13 Mar 2000 11:46:45 -0800 (PST)
  • HTTP Age Header Field (Section 14.6) - should overflow value be 2^31 or (2^31)-1? Sat, 11 Mar 2000 01:07:42 -0800
• Matthew Turner
  • Re: monitored???? Thu, 05 Oct 2000 18:08:18 PDT
• Miles Sabin
  • RE: Conformance Test for HTTP 1.1 Fri, 6 Oct 2000 10:24:14 +0100
  • RE: Using Chunked encoding to send control messages to a client Fri, 5 May 2000 16:54:24 +0100
  • Proxies and incorrect Content-Length Mon, 20 Mar 2000 12:35:14 -0000
  • RE: On pipelining -Reply Fri, 21 Jan 2000 17:39:55 -0000
  • RE: On pipelining -Reply Fri, 21 Jan 2000 17:25:15 -0000
  • Idempotent sequences of methods Fri, 21 Jan 2000 16:47:15 -0000
  • RE: On pipelining Fri, 21 Jan 2000 16:00:26 -0000
  • RE: Browser support for request pipelining Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:04:06 -0000
  • RE: Browser support for request pipelining Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:58:17 -0000
  • Browser support for request pipelining Thu, 20 Jan 2000 19:08:51 -0000
• nate
  • HTTP/proxy calls Wed, 12 Jan 2000 10:19:44 -0600
• ned.freed@innosoft.com
  • Review of Platform for Privacy Preferences (P3P) requested Thu, 11 May 2000 09:26:20 -0800 (PST)
• Nguyen, Dien
  • HTTP Format and How HTTP works Wed, 12 Apr 2000 09:12:31 -0400
• OSeemann@gmx.net
  • problem with responses to post-requests Fri, 25 Aug 2000 12:32:15 +0200 (MEST)
• Pae Choi
  • Unidentified subject! Sun, 19 Mar 2000 18:45:51 -0600
• Pascal FOURGUET
  • HTTP image transfer Thu, 28 Sep 2000 13:28:39 +0200
• Patrick McManus
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 2 Nov 2000 15:17:14 -0500
  • 1.1 proxy interaction with 1.0 client and bad EOF behavior Tue, 28 Mar 2000 11:08:27 -0500 (EST)
  • Re: HTTP entity length Tue, 1 Feb 2000 13:44:09 -0500 (EST)
• Patrik Carlsson
  • Http overhead Thu, 30 Nov 2000 10:31:01 +0100
• Patrik Winroth
  • Re: Http overhead Thu, 30 Nov 2000 11:32:19 +0100 (CET)
  • Re: Browser support for request pipelining Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:44:46 +0100
• pdf@bizfon.com
  • Push technology Wed, 15 Nov 2000 12:43:11 -0500
• Peter W
  • Re: ticket based authentication Wed, 9 Aug 2000 20:11:33 -0400 (EDT)
  • RE: webmail vulnerabilities: a new pragma token? Thu, 20 Jan 2000 08:04:24 -0500 (EST)
  • webmail vulnerabilities: a new pragma token? Wed, 19 Jan 2000 08:45:00 -0500 (EST)
• Phillip Hallam-Baker
  • Re: cookies patent Sat, 5 Feb 2000 22:04:25 -0500
• Ramana Tadepalli
  • monitored???? Thu, 5 Oct 2000 11:59:09 +0530
• Rohit Khare
  • Re: draft-ietf-tls-http-upgrade reissued Thu, 4 May 2000 09:48:14 -0700
  • Re: draft-ietf-tls-http-upgrade reissued Wed, 3 May 2000 23:10:57 -0700
• Roy T. Fielding
  • Re: Question for HTTP/1.1 cache implementors (both proxy & client caches) Wed, 19 Apr 2000 18:21:22 -0700
  • Re: Question for HTTP/1.1 cache implementors (both proxy & client caches) Wed, 19 Apr 2000 16:02:33 -0700
  • Re: cookies patent Sat, 05 Feb 2000 17:15:31 -0800
  • cookies patent Fri, 04 Feb 2000 20:28:03 -0800
  • Re: HTTP entity length Wed, 02 Feb 2000 11:29:42 -0800
  • Re: HTTP entity length Wed, 02 Feb 2000 11:22:19 -0800
• Ruslan Belkin
  • Re: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Fri, 03 Nov 2000 15:16:25 -0800
• Scott Lawrence
  • Re: Http overhead Thu, 30 Nov 2000 09:16:47 -0500
  • Re: IPv6 and HTTP (1.2?) Tue, 28 Nov 2000 08:55:35 -0500
  • RE: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 2 Nov 2000 12:06:52 -0500
  • RE: Host header and URL Thu, 26 Oct 2000 09:10:45 -0400
  • RE: Conformance Test for HTTP 1.1 Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:20:56 -0400
  • RE: Conformance Test for HTTP 1.1 Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:02:37 -0400
  • RE: Conformance Test for HTTP 1.1 Thu, 5 Oct 2000 14:35:29 -0400
  • RE: "Via" header field Mon, 2 Oct 2000 09:21:48 -0400
  • RE: HTTP/1.1: RFC2068 versus RFC2616, RFC1590 versus RFC2048 Mon, 11 Sep 2000 11:59:26 -0400
  • RE: problem with responses to post-requests Fri, 25 Aug 2000 07:36:57 -0400
  • RE: ticket based authentication Wed, 2 Aug 2000 14:13:10 -0400
  • RE: CRLF on POST requests, where/how specified (repost from prior bad subject line) Tue, 20 Jun 2000 13:36:45 -0400
  • RE: draft-ietf-tls-http-upgrade reissued Thu, 4 May 2000 18:28:00 -0400
  • RE: draft-ietf-tls-http-upgrade reissued Thu, 4 May 2000 07:55:30 -0400
  • RE: Question on proxy/client behaviour Mon, 24 Apr 2000 14:45:05 -0400
  • RE: Microsoft HTTP 1.1 Conformance? Wed, 12 Apr 2000 10:06:23 -0400
  • RE: Question of many METHODs Wed, 5 Apr 2000 09:04:27 -0400
  • RE: Chunked sample message Fri, 4 Feb 2000 14:37:42 -0500
  • RE: HTTP entity length Wed, 2 Feb 2000 13:38:18 -0500
  • RE: On pipelining Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:59:41 -0500
  • RE: Browser support for request pipelining Fri, 21 Jan 2000 08:57:09 -0500
  • RE: webmail vulnerabilities: a new pragma token? Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:51:35 -0500
  • RE: webmail vulnerabilities: a new pragma token? Wed, 19 Jan 2000 14:08:34 -0500
  • draft-ietf-tls-http-upgrade reissued Thu, 6 Jan 2000 09:31:16 -0500
• sumanth
  • Re: Use Proxy 305 (corrected) Sun, 27 Aug 2000 22:11:59 -0400
• Thomas McLaren
  • IPv6 and HTTP (1.2?) Tue, 28 Nov 2000 11:51:39
• Thomson James
  • Set-Cookie Header Fri, 8 Dec 2000 08:55:59 -0000
• Tim Chao
  • Two questions Sun, 23 Jan 2000 09:54:06 -0800
• Tim Coates
  • Thanks Re Caching Problem Thu, 9 Nov 2000 08:05:59 +1100
  • Caching Problem with 1.0 and a Proxy Server Wed, 8 Nov 2000 11:30:20 +1100
  • caching problems Thu, 26 Oct 2000 11:50:45 +1000
• Tom McLaren
  • RE: IPv6 and HTTP (1.2?) Tue, 28 Nov 2000 17:36:56 -0000
• ujros
  • Chunked sample message Fri, 04 Feb 2000 11:07:46 -0800
• Vivek
  • A Typical HTTP Problem Thu, 23 Mar 2000 17:17:03 +0530
• Volsinians@aol.com
  • Re: cookies patent Sat, 5 Feb 2000 22:11:05 EST
• Wallace, William
  • RE: Of HTTP/1.1 persistent connections and TCP Keepalive timers Thu, 2 Nov 2000 13:19:46 -0500
• Wilbur Streett
  • Re: Cookie problem with IE5 and Windows 2000 Sat, 27 May 2000 22:41:01 -0400
  • Cookie problem with IE5 and Windows 2000 Thu, 18 May 2000 10:34:39 -0400
• Windes, Edwin
  • Non-transparent proxies and the Vary header field Thu, 20 Apr 2000 09:19:44 -0500
• Yngve N. Pettersen
  • Re: Browser support for request pipelining Fri, 21 Jan 2000 15:43:36 +0100
• young ka ming
  • Re: persistent conncetion HOL blocking Fri, 12 May 2000 15:09:47 +0800 (HKT)

Last message date: Tue 08 Dec 1970 - 06:53:52 PST
Archived on: Wed Jan 31 2001 - 20:41:03 PST

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ]
• Other mail archives