Re: cookies patent

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Keith Moore: "IETF Adelaide and interim meetings for APPS WGs"
• Previous message: Phillip Hallam-Baker: "Re: cookies patent"
• Maybe in reply to: Roy T. Fielding: "cookies patent"

In a message dated 2/5/00 10:08:05 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
hallam@ai.mit.edu writes:

> ??? I for one would be very pleased if the Cookies patent was rigorously
>  enforced, provided nobody could get a license on any terms whatsoever.
>  
>  Cookies are an abomination. As many predicted they are used to invade
>  privacy.
>  
>  Not that we can get rid of them, but cest la vie.

It would hardly be the first time a disgusting kludge has been patented.

Joachim Martillo

• Next message: Keith Moore: "IETF Adelaide and interim meetings for APPS WGs"
• Previous message: Phillip Hallam-Baker: "Re: cookies patent"
• Maybe in reply to: Roy T. Fielding: "cookies patent"