Re: Comments (Part 3) on HTTP I-D Rev 05 (#'s 116, 134, 135,
Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (frystyk@w3.org)
Mon, 16 Nov 1998 18:42:46 -0500
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Jim Gettys: "Fwd: Warning and I18N question (Adams #60)."
- Previous message: Jim Gettys: "Re: Comments (Part 3) on HTTP I-D Rev 05 (#'s 116, 134, 135, 138,"
- In reply to: Jim Gettys: "Re: Comments (Part 3) on HTTP I-D Rev 05 (#'s 116, 134, 135, 138,"
- Next in thread: Koen Holtman: "Re: Comments (Part 3) on HTTP I-D Rev 05 (#'s 116, 134, 135,"
- Reply: Koen Holtman: "Re: Comments (Part 3) on HTTP I-D Rev 05 (#'s 116, 134, 135,"
At 15:34 11/16/98 -0800, Jim Gettys wrote:
>Basically, the q-values are used as binary values. Understanding deflate
>with -.65 doesn't make a lot of sense to me."
Just to clear out any confusion, the dash is not a minus - it's a typo.
Henrik
- Next message: Jim Gettys: "Fwd: Warning and I18N question (Adams #60)."
- Previous message: Jim Gettys: "Re: Comments (Part 3) on HTTP I-D Rev 05 (#'s 116, 134, 135, 138,"
- In reply to: Jim Gettys: "Re: Comments (Part 3) on HTTP I-D Rev 05 (#'s 116, 134, 135, 138,"
- Next in thread: Koen Holtman: "Re: Comments (Part 3) on HTTP I-D Rev 05 (#'s 116, 134, 135,"
- Reply: Koen Holtman: "Re: Comments (Part 3) on HTTP I-D Rev 05 (#'s 116, 134, 135,"