Re: Content-Disposition

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Ben Laurie: "Re: de facto standard of HTTP"
• Previous message: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claus_Andr=E9_F=E4rber?=: "Content-Disposition"
• In reply to: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claus_Andr=E9_F=E4rber?=: "Content-Disposition"
• Next in thread: Koen Holtman: "Re: Content-Disposition"
• Reply: Koen Holtman: "Re: Content-Disposition"

This is taken from the MIME useage of Content-Disposition.

We will not differ from current Web usage (without changing the name).

We will not add new material to HTTP/1.1 at this late date (we have
finished working group last call, and have asked the area directors
to start the approval process.

However, feel free (as a separate document) to propose improvements
in this area.

Is our description in variance with other MIME or current Web cleint usage?
				- Jim Gettys

• Next message: Ben Laurie: "Re: de facto standard of HTTP"
• Previous message: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claus_Andr=E9_F=E4rber?=: "Content-Disposition"
• In reply to: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claus_Andr=E9_F=E4rber?=: "Content-Disposition"
• Next in thread: Koen Holtman: "Re: Content-Disposition"
• Reply: Koen Holtman: "Re: Content-Disposition"