Scott Lawrence wrote: > > Paul Leach wrote: > > > I think that absence of cnonce should be illegal if qop=auth or > > qop=auth-int is selected by the client; if the client really _demands_ > > to be totally braindead, it can send a constant as its cnonce. > > I'm also happy with that solution. Just what does "illegal" mean? What should a server do if it gets such an "illegal" request? Dave Kristol