Re: Fwd: A suggestion for correction on HTTP/1.1 draft

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Richard Gray: "ISSUE: revalidation"
• Previous message: Jim Gettys: "Progress on testing HTTP/1.1."
• In reply to: Jim Gettys: "Fwd: A suggestion for correction on HTTP/1.1 draft"

On Mon, 6 Jul 1998, Jim Gettys wrote:

> 
> For some reason, Ravi had trouble posting this.
> 			- Jim

And for some reason, my mail program refuses to quote attachments ...
grrr.

Anyway, I would note that destination server would be a good english
term for PUT as well. 

But I think that the phrase origin server has a meaning in the
specification beyond direction of the transaction data and is used
in contrast to proxies, etc.  Understood to be one end-point of the
logical transaction where the response originates. Hence I'd vote for
removing destination server and using origin server.

Dave Morris

• Next message: Richard Gray: "ISSUE: revalidation"
• Previous message: Jim Gettys: "Progress on testing HTTP/1.1."
• In reply to: Jim Gettys: "Fwd: A suggestion for correction on HTTP/1.1 draft"