Re: comments on HTTP/1.1 Rev02 20Feb98

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Jim Gettys: "Editorial issue 304-SHOULD"
• Previous message: David W. Morris: "OPTIONS and TRACE vis a vis CGI applications"
• In reply to: Jim Gettys: "Re: comments on HTTP/1.1 Rev02 20Feb98"

>> 1) 2.1, implied *LWS
>>     I would feel better if "... between any two tokens" made it clear
>>     we're talking about the grammatical non-terminal "token".  In
>>     compiler-speak, ';' is also a token, but that's not what's meant
>>     here.
>
>Dunno quite what you want here....

I guess something like "... between any two tokens (for the definition of
"token" above)."

Maybe it's just my compiler background getting in the way.  Or maybe my
remark is irrelevant.  (And it's late, and I'm tired.... :-)

Dave Kristol

• Next message: Jim Gettys: "Editorial issue 304-SHOULD"
• Previous message: David W. Morris: "OPTIONS and TRACE vis a vis CGI applications"
• In reply to: Jim Gettys: "Re: comments on HTTP/1.1 Rev02 20Feb98"