Re: Editorial Issue: HTTP Trademarked by MIT or W3C

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Andrew Daviel: "http acceleration and Date headers (fwd)"
• Previous message: John Franks: "Re: issue & resolution: IF_PRECEDENCE"
• Maybe in reply to: David W. Morris: "Editorial Issue: HTTP Trademarked by MIT or W3C"

>I just noticed a couple of days ago that the W3C claims to own HTTP 
>as a trademark. (This is on the W3C web site:
>  http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice.html#W3C 
>is one list). Assuming that notice is represents a valid claim to a
>trademark, aren't we required to acknowledge the trademark?


I'll find out what the status is and report back; until then, let's not deal with this.
If something is necessary, we'll catch it before the RFC issues.

Larry

• Next message: Andrew Daviel: "http acceleration and Date headers (fwd)"
• Previous message: John Franks: "Re: issue & resolution: IF_PRECEDENCE"
• Maybe in reply to: David W. Morris: "Editorial Issue: HTTP Trademarked by MIT or W3C"