Re: Multiple Content-Location headers

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Einar Stefferud: "Re: Multiple Content-Location headers"
• Previous message: Mark Stemm: "Re: New content negotiation draft available"
• In reply to: Jim Gettys: "Re: Multiple Content-Location headers"

Hi Jim -- 

I hope the garbling of all that included text was an accident;-)...  I
was gretly revlied to discover that there were no comments inserted
there-in;-)...  (I trust such garbelling is not considered to be a
useful feature of WEB Mail UAs;-)...

Next, I think we may be out of synch in the discussion.

MHTML folk almost immediately gave up on the ideas of allowing
multiple Content-location headers, or of giving them multiple
values...  

This is no longer any kind of an issue between HTTP and MHTML!!!!
We are now looking for two other new things:

1.  Are there any other gotchas lurking in the HTTP/MHTML wood pile
    that we have not noticed before, since all us woodpile residents
    would like to avoid all possible hidden gotchas???

2.  Can we use the new idea articulated by Nick Shelness to use a new
    Content-Label header, or allow a new Content-Alternate-Location?

I think MHTML is leaning toward Content-Alternate-Location, but lets
consider both in looking for gotchas.

Cheers...\Stef

• Next message: Einar Stefferud: "Re: Multiple Content-Location headers"
• Previous message: Mark Stemm: "Re: New content negotiation draft available"
• In reply to: Jim Gettys: "Re: Multiple Content-Location headers"