Re: If-None-Match and IMS (new Issue IMS_INM_MISMATCH)

David W. Morris (dwm@xpasc.com)
Tue, 11 Nov 1997 23:00:26 -0800 (PST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: draft-lundblade-1pass-mult-alt-00.txt vs. alternates"
Previous message: Larry Masinter: "draft-lundblade-1pass-mult-alt-00.txt vs. alternates"
In reply to: Jim Gettys: "If-None-Match and IMS (new Issue IMS_INM_MISMATCH)"
Next in thread: Jeffrey Mogul: "Re: If-None-Match and IMS (new Issue IMS_INM_MISMATCH)"

On Tue, 11 Nov 1997, Jim Gettys wrote:

> This documents discussions on the implementation list that shows
> a new protocol issue (IMS_INM_MISMATCH).

My recollection of intent matches the implementation Roy described.
If-None-Match supercedes IMS when both are present.

Dave Morris

Next message: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: draft-lundblade-1pass-mult-alt-00.txt vs. alternates"
Previous message: Larry Masinter: "draft-lundblade-1pass-mult-alt-00.txt vs. alternates"
In reply to: Jim Gettys: "If-None-Match and IMS (new Issue IMS_INM_MISMATCH)"
Next in thread: Jeffrey Mogul: "Re: If-None-Match and IMS (new Issue IMS_INM_MISMATCH)"