Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-04.txt

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Dave Kristol: "draft-fielding-url-syntax-08 issue"
• Previous message: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org: "I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-04.txt"
• In reply to: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org: "I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-04.txt"

Before anyone wastes their time reading this new draft of the
hit-metering document, I should point out that the ONLY change
in this draft (relative to draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-03.txt)
is the inclusion of this statement (in the "Terminology" section):

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHOULD", SHOULD NOT",
   "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be
   interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [1].

at the request of the IESG (and the consequential renumbering of
the bibliography, since "Bradner" sorts before all of other cited
authors.)

I should have updated one or two of the other references when I
had the chance, but I guess this can be done when the document
reaches the RFC stage.

-Jeff

• Next message: Dave Kristol: "draft-fielding-url-syntax-08 issue"
• Previous message: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org: "I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-04.txt"
• In reply to: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org: "I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-04.txt"