Re: RE-VERSION
David W. Morris (dwm@xpasc.com)
Sat, 9 Aug 1997 14:05:15 -0700 (PDT)
On Sat, 9 Aug 1997, John Franks wrote:
> The current specification is workable, but problematic. All the
> issues mentioned above have, indeed, been raised before and are in
> the archives. Emphatically denying their existence may temporarily
> silence the topic on the mailing list, but doesn't help implementors.
> The fact that the issue gets rehashed every six months might be taken
> as prima facie evidence that the design could be improved.
Yes.
Dave Morris