Re: 301/302
John Franks (john@math.nwu.edu)
Fri, 1 Aug 1997 08:28:42 -0500 (CDT)
On Fri, 1 Aug 1997, Ben Laurie wrote:
>
> OK. It still seems to me that the correct thing to do is to fix CGI. A
> simple thing to do would be to add a version header:
>
> CGI-Version: 1.1
>
> Absence of the header means the script is 1.0 compliant. This is not an
> HTTP header - the server would strip it, I assume, and doctor other
> headers as needed.
>
The current (widely deployed) version of CGI is called version 1.1.
This has nothing to do with HTTP versions. Thus something other
than "CGI-Version: 1.1" would be advisable to avoid confusion.
John Franks Dept of Math. Northwestern University
john@math.nwu.edu