Re: 301/302

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Jim Gettys: "New Editorial issue MESSAGE-BODY"
• Previous message: David W. Morris: "Re: Issues-list item "CACHING-CGI""
• Maybe in reply to: Yaron Goland: "301/302"
• Next in thread: Larry Masinter: "Re: 301/302"

Yaron Goland wrote:
> 
> Scripts are deployed and they are not going to get re-written.
> 
> Servers have no mechanism for determining if a script is 1.0 or 1.1 and
> even if they did, they do not have facilities for taken any special
> action in that case.

Which is, of course, a deficiency in CGI (and related) specs. If anyone
ever gets around to sorting them out, they really ought to have a
version number somewhere in the conversation between server and script.

Cheers,

Ben.

-- 
Ben Laurie                Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435  Email:
ben@algroup.co.uk
Freelance Consultant and  Fax:   +44 (181) 994 6472
Technical Director        URL: http://www.algroup.co.uk/Apache-SSL
A.L. Digital Ltd,         Apache Group member (http://www.apache.org)
London, England.          Apache-SSL author

• Next message: Jim Gettys: "New Editorial issue MESSAGE-BODY"
• Previous message: David W. Morris: "Re: Issues-list item "CACHING-CGI""
• Maybe in reply to: Yaron Goland: "301/302"
• Next in thread: Larry Masinter: "Re: 301/302"