Re: [Fwd: 301/302]

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: David W. Morris: "Re: Set-Cookie2: "additive" vs. "independent""
• Previous message: Josh Cohen: "Re: Feedback on: draft-cohen-http305306-02.txt"
• In reply to: Josh Cohen: "[Fwd: 301/302]"
• Next in thread: Roy T. Fielding: "response w/o content-length"
• Reply: Roy T. Fielding: "response w/o content-length"

On Tue, 29 Jul 1997, Josh Cohen wrote:


  [NON-Text Body part not included]

The question was whether a 1.0 response w/o content length had to 
be fixed up by a proxy .... my interpretation is that there are
three choices:

1.  Accumulate the body and create a correct content-length before
    forwarding.
2.  Add a cunked transfer encoding header and accumulate chunks
    and forward then with proper length fields
3.  Don't report the response as HTTP/1.1 in the status line

All of this of course presumes that the request was HTTP/1.1.

Dave Morris

• Next message: David W. Morris: "Re: Set-Cookie2: "additive" vs. "independent""
• Previous message: Josh Cohen: "Re: Feedback on: draft-cohen-http305306-02.txt"
• In reply to: Josh Cohen: "[Fwd: 301/302]"
• Next in thread: Roy T. Fielding: "response w/o content-length"
• Reply: Roy T. Fielding: "response w/o content-length"