Re: Is 100-Continue hop-by-hop?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Dave Kristol: "Re: LAST CALL, "HTTP State Management Mechanism (Rev1) " to Propo"
• Previous message: Yaron Goland: "RE: LAST CALL, "HTTP State Management Mechanism (Rev1) " to Propo"
• In reply to: Koen Holtman: "Re: Is 100-Continue hop-by-hop?"

>But I guess that what he actually had in mind was 
>
>  <copy request> <100 response about progress=50%> <100 response about
>  progress=100%> <200 OK response to copy request>
>
>And this latter case would indeed work through a multiplexing proxy
>(though the code would have to be 101 or something, with semantics
>slightly different from 100). 

101 is already being used, but yes it would definitely have to be
a new 1xx code.  Extensibility is meant to be used.

.....Roy

• Next message: Dave Kristol: "Re: LAST CALL, "HTTP State Management Mechanism (Rev1) " to Propo"
• Previous message: Yaron Goland: "RE: LAST CALL, "HTTP State Management Mechanism (Rev1) " to Propo"
• In reply to: Koen Holtman: "Re: Is 100-Continue hop-by-hop?"