Re: Revised HTTP WG charter dates

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Koen Holtman: "Re: ISSUE CONTENT-ENCODING: Proposed wording"
• Previous message: Koen Holtman: "Re: Content negotiation requirements"
• In reply to: Larry Masinter: "Revised HTTP WG charter dates"

Larry Masinter:
>
[...]
>Here are the proposed dates. If there is no objection by
>July 15, I will submit a revised charter based on these
>dates.
>
>- July 15: submit Hit Metering to IESG as Proposed Standard
>  draft-ietf-http-hit-metering-02.txt

I'd hate to state the obvious, but I am not aware of there being a WG
last call on Hit Metering, so you'd better do a last call soon.

Also, repeating what I said in an earlier reply on milestones:

|Two pieces of information are still missing with respect to hit
|metering:
|
| - Roy was opposed in the latest last call, I don't think we have seen
|   him comment on the latest draft yet.
| - We have no clear view of how many implementers want to implement
|   this thing.

These pieces would not take much time to supply before July 15, but I
would like to see them supplied.


All the other dates look fine to me.  Let me confirm that yes, there
will be a revised TCN draft by July 30, and that I am strongly in
favour of this WG releasing the thing as an experimental RFC soon after
Munich, because there are some implementers who need something frozen.

Koen.

• Next message: Koen Holtman: "Re: ISSUE CONTENT-ENCODING: Proposed wording"
• Previous message: Koen Holtman: "Re: Content negotiation requirements"
• In reply to: Larry Masinter: "Revised HTTP WG charter dates"