Re: 305/306 response codes

Ross Patterson (Ross_Patterson@ns.reston.vmd.sterling.com)
Thu, 12 Jun 97 08:49:44 EDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: owl@owlsnest.com: "Is Your Web Site A Secret?"
Previous message: Pixieo2@aol.com: "Re: MUST a client wait for 100 when doing PUT or POST?"
Maybe in reply to: Josh Cohen: "305/306 response codes"
Next in thread: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: 305/306 response codes"

Josh Cohen <josh@netscape.com> writes:

>* URL transformation for scope.
>  reversing the domain name is unlike most other formats.
>  The benefit here is it expresses the correct order
>  of diminishing significance, and allows a simple memcmp()
>  in implementation.

Just let's not forget that domain names are case-insensitive, so memcmp()
isn't quite the answer.

Ross Patterson
Sterling Software, Inc.
VM Software Division

Next message: owl@owlsnest.com: "Is Your Web Site A Secret?"
Previous message: Pixieo2@aol.com: "Re: MUST a client wait for 100 when doing PUT or POST?"
Maybe in reply to: Josh Cohen: "305/306 response codes"
Next in thread: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: 305/306 response codes"