Re: New feature negotiation syntax

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Ross Patterson: "Re: COMMENT: LAST CALL comment"
• Previous message: Scott Lawrence: "Re: New feature negotiation syntax"
• Maybe in reply to: Koen Holtman: "New feature negotiation syntax"
• Next in thread: Larry Masinter: "Re: New feature negotiation syntax"

>  My hope is that once an agreed-upon TCN standard exists (even if
>   only Experimental) that we will be able to show that it does solve a
>   suffiently large part of the problem to create user support for it.

This was in the context of the discussion where I was asking that
"the problem" which TCN solves a "sufficiently large part" be described
cogently enough that we can agree that it is an important problem
to solve, independently of our various opinions about whether TCN is
a good solution.

Regards,

Larry
-- 
http://www.parc.xerox.com/masinter

• Next message: Ross Patterson: "Re: COMMENT: LAST CALL comment"
• Previous message: Scott Lawrence: "Re: New feature negotiation syntax"
• Maybe in reply to: Koen Holtman: "New feature negotiation syntax"
• Next in thread: Larry Masinter: "Re: New feature negotiation syntax"