Re: Apache and HTTP/1.1

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Misha Wolf: "Unicode Conference - Final Reminder"
• Previous message: Foteos Macrides: "Re: Comments on the new cookie draft"
• Maybe in reply to: rlgray@raleigh.ibm.com: "Apache and HTTP/1.1"

Marc Slemko wrote:
> 
> This is really an implementation problem with the client.  Whatever
> arguments there are for sending a RST when the client wants to abort a
> connection (and the reasons appear valid), I do not see any reason to send
> it for a normal (err... normal as in a normal transaction, since a large
> percentage of HTTP connections are terminated by being aborted by the
> client) server-initiated close.  Someone at Netscape has said they will
> probably be changing this so that Navigator only sends a RST when the
> client is aborting the connection, not during a server-initiated close.
> Unsure about what MS plans.
Yes, thats the plan, only do a RST for an abort.

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Josh Cohen				        Netscape Communications Corp.
Netscape Fire Department	       
Server Engineering
josh@netscape.com                      
http://home.netscape.com/people/josh/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

• Next message: Misha Wolf: "Unicode Conference - Final Reminder"
• Previous message: Foteos Macrides: "Re: Comments on the new cookie draft"
• Maybe in reply to: rlgray@raleigh.ibm.com: "Apache and HTTP/1.1"