Re: Comments on the new cookie draft

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: urbani@ares.mctel.fr: "Using of Connection header"
• Previous message: David W. Morris: "Re: Comments on the new cookie draft"
• Maybe in reply to: Yaron Goland: "Comments on the new cookie draft"
• Next in thread: Larry Masinter: "Re: Comments on the new cookie draft"

  [proposal for Nopersist...]

  > > While I have no objections to this idea, it's the first time I can
  > > remember its being expressed here.  Did I miss it?
  > 
  > No, I believe you and I discussed the concept briefly at the last IETF but
  > I believe we concluded it was a future change because of timing and
  > compatibility concerns between original and 'new' cookies. I brough it up
  > now because it looked like a new header was needed for setcookie to
  > resolve other issues so perhaps there was a window of opportunity here.

Yes, it probably is an opportunity to toss it into the mix.  I'll see what
I can come up with.

Dave Kristol

• Next message: urbani@ares.mctel.fr: "Using of Connection header"
• Previous message: David W. Morris: "Re: Comments on the new cookie draft"
• Maybe in reply to: Yaron Goland: "Comments on the new cookie draft"
• Next in thread: Larry Masinter: "Re: Comments on the new cookie draft"