Re: REPOST (was: HTTP working group status & issues)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Bill Janssen: "Fwd: Discussion of new object-oriented binary wire protocol for HTTP-NG"
• Previous message: Rens Troost: "Re: content-disposition header"

koen@win.tue.nl (Koen Holtman) wrote:
>I personally have little interest in taking the work beyond a `safe:
>yes' mini-ID.  I don't think a bookmarking standard would create much
>added value.

	I wasn't referring to the bookmark file structure, but to
standards regulating privacy and security issues, beyond safety, per
se, if a server saved the post-content for access via a network URL,
as the "rel=source alternative" would appear to require, if it could
be made workable at all.  This wouldn't be necessary if you contribute
a mini-ID just for the Safe: yes | no header, as I hope you do.

				Fote

=========================================================================
 Foteos Macrides            Worcester Foundation for Biomedical Research
 MACRIDES@SCI.WFBR.EDU         222 Maple Avenue, Shrewsbury, MA 01545
=========================================================================

• Next message: Bill Janssen: "Fwd: Discussion of new object-oriented binary wire protocol for HTTP-NG"
• Previous message: Rens Troost: "Re: content-disposition header"