Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: hallam@ai.mit.edu: "Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]"
• Previous message: Paul Hoffman: "Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]"
• Maybe in reply to: Larry Masinter: "[moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]"
• Next in thread: hallam@ai.mit.edu: "Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]"

Larry Masinter writes:
> It is my belief that it is the intent of the working group that digest
> authentication be part of HTTP/1.1. 
> 
> If you disagree, would you please let me know ASAP?

I do agree that digest is essential but if both documents are already 
approved by the IESG then how can this be done without introducing 
significant delay in the process? Will IESG react different to a "docked" 
digest document versus a simple reference from Chapter 11.2 or was the 
approval a "blank check" for what we decide on?

Henrik


-- 
Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, <frystyk@w3.org>
World Wide Web Consortium, MIT/LCS NE43-356
545 Technology Square, Cambridge MA 02139, USA

• Next message: hallam@ai.mit.edu: "Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]"
• Previous message: Paul Hoffman: "Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]"
• Maybe in reply to: Larry Masinter: "[moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]"
• Next in thread: hallam@ai.mit.edu: "Re: [moore@cs.utk.edu: http digest auth + http 1.1?]"