Re: (ACCEPT*) Draft text for Accept headers
Maurizio Codogno (mau@beatles.cselt.stet.it)
Thu, 4 Apr 1996 16:06:44 +0200
Koen wrote:
% If you have comments on this text, now is the time to comment. I
% intend to close this issue at the end of the week. This means that I
% will send a last call for disagreement with perceived consensus,
% together with a possibly improved version of the text below, in a few
% days.
% If no Accept header is present, then it is assumed that the client
% | accepts all media types. If Accept headers are present, and if the
% | resource cannot send a response which is acceptable according to
% | the Accept headers, then the server should send an error response
% | with the 413 (not acceptable) status code, though the sending of an
% | un-acceptable response is also allowed.
I don't agree with this: let's suppose I want an audio file, but I can
read only .wav and no .au . Should I get the whole .au file and then =
notice
that it is unreadable for me? It does not seem sensitive, especially
since there is already a default to get any type (namely, no Accept line
at all)
Is it possible at least to state things in such a way that in 1.2 the=20
situation will change (I don't know, maybe adding an Accept-Only
header if people believe that my view is stupid)? After all, we have
already a SHOULD, so it should not be that difficult to promote it to
a MUST in the next version...
.mau.