Re: About that Host: header....

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: jg@w3.org: "(CONTENT) draft wording for W.G. review"
• Previous message: jg@w3.org: "(DNS) draft wording for W.G. review."
• Maybe in reply to: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no: "About that Host: header...."

I would like to see one thing (as discussed at the LA IETF):

I think we should require (MUST) that servers accept full URL's with all
methods in HTTP 1.1. I think this will greatly help our transition strategy
in the future. I do not think that we should have clients sending full URLs
(Maybe unless they already know that a particular server is a HTTP 1.1
server in which case they could omit the Host field and just send the full URL?)

Alex Hopmann
ResNova Software, Inc.
hopmann@holonet.net

• Next message: jg@w3.org: "(CONTENT) draft wording for W.G. review"
• Previous message: jg@w3.org: "(DNS) draft wording for W.G. review."
• Maybe in reply to: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no: "About that Host: header...."