Re: Where should Digest go next?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Brian Gaines: "Re: Caching data returned from POST, and conditional POST"
• Previous message: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd: "Re: Where should Digest go next?"
• Maybe in reply to: Eric W. Sink: "Where should Digest go next?"
• Next in thread: Alex Hopmann: "Re: Where should Digest go next?"

At 6:26 PM 1/3/96, Larry Masinter wrote:
>3- Submit as Informational, as part of HTTP/1.0
>. . .
>The problem with option 3 is that it would delay the (already late)
>HTTP/1.0 spec.

Further, it was not implemented in many places, so it isn't really
appropriate for the 1.0 draft. Worse yet, the Internet-Draft for it has
expired and isn't available on the IETF server.

I think that it isn't really part of what people think of as HTTP 1.0, and
shouldn't be included in the 1.0 draft.

--Paul Hoffman
--Internet Mail Consortium

• Next message: Brian Gaines: "Re: Caching data returned from POST, and conditional POST"
• Previous message: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd: "Re: Where should Digest go next?"
• Maybe in reply to: Eric W. Sink: "Where should Digest go next?"
• Next in thread: Alex Hopmann: "Re: Where should Digest go next?"