Re: Keep-Alive Notes

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Shel Kaphan: "Keep-Alive Notes"
• Previous message: Eric W. Sink: "Re: Keep-Alive Notes"
• Maybe in reply to: Shel Kaphan: "Keep-Alive Notes"
• Next in thread: Simon Spero: "Re: Keep-Alive Notes"

> Huh?  To me, it doesn't make sense to add a header to the HTTP
> spec whose only function is "to be determined".  Either we need
> it and its function should be specified, or we aren't sure and
> so we shouldn't put it in the spec.

How about if I rephrase?

Let's agree that if we later want to add parameters to Keep-Alive, 
we'll add them in a separate header, designated by the token in the 
Connection header; NOT stuff them right into the Connection header.

Eric W. Sink
eric@spyglass.com         http://www.spyglass.com/~eric/

• Next message: Shel Kaphan: "Keep-Alive Notes"
• Previous message: Eric W. Sink: "Re: Keep-Alive Notes"
• Maybe in reply to: Shel Kaphan: "Keep-Alive Notes"
• Next in thread: Simon Spero: "Re: Keep-Alive Notes"