Re: HTTP/1.0 Issues

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Eric W. Sink: "Comments on latest draft"
• Previous message: Simon Spero: "HTTP-NG checkpoint 2"
• In reply to: Roy T. Fielding: "HTTP/1.0 Issues"

>    5.4.1 Accept:
 ...
>        Should the q value of */* default to 0.5?

        Ummm...   Is 1.0 a cap?   Or is it  "unity"?   If the latter,
then 1.0 should the norm,  into which  */*  would fall,  all others
being  +/-  from there.   Thoughts?

--
Rick Troth <troth@ua1vm.ua.edu>, Houston, Texas, USA
http://ua1vm.ua.edu/~troth/

• Next message: Eric W. Sink: "Comments on latest draft"
• Previous message: Simon Spero: "HTTP-NG checkpoint 2"
• In reply to: Roy T. Fielding: "HTTP/1.0 Issues"