Re: Getting full URI to the server

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Larry Masinter: "original host name in request/header"
• Previous message: M. Hedlund: "Re: Getting full URI to the server"
• Maybe in reply to: Mike Cowlishaw: "Getting full URI to the server"
• Next in thread: Chuck Shotton: "Re: Getting full URI to the server"

It seems like it would be simple enough to simply add in an additional
header, so that clients and servers (and proxies) could phase in
support as they wish.

I guess the only real questions I have are:

  a) would anyone do it?
  b) is it too much of a `hack'?  The main advantage over simply
     changing the format of what gets sent to the server is that it's
     a smaller, simpler change and thus may be more likely to get
     implemented.

Opinions?

• Next message: Larry Masinter: "original host name in request/header"
• Previous message: M. Hedlund: "Re: Getting full URI to the server"
• Maybe in reply to: Mike Cowlishaw: "Getting full URI to the server"
• Next in thread: Chuck Shotton: "Re: Getting full URI to the server"