RE: Two proposals for HTTP/2.0

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: John Franks: "Re: Two proposals for HTTP/2.0"
• Previous message: John Franks: "Two proposals for HTTP/2.0"
• Next in thread: John Franks: "Re: Two proposals for HTTP/2.0"
• Reply: John Franks: "Re: Two proposals for HTTP/2.0"

Re the first proposal, to incorporate the hostname somewhere. This
would be cleanest put into the URL itself :-

GET http://hostname/fred http/2.0

This is the syntax for proxy redirects.


This suggestion conflicts with the aims of the second I'm affraid. I
don't think that its a good thing for a server to not know its name.
Proxying is far too prevelant now and a server that doth not know
its name shall be called a LOOP. 

Phill

• Next message: John Franks: "Re: Two proposals for HTTP/2.0"
• Previous message: John Franks: "Two proposals for HTTP/2.0"
• Next in thread: John Franks: "Re: Two proposals for HTTP/2.0"
• Reply: John Franks: "Re: Two proposals for HTTP/2.0"